Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arlinda Rushiti vs Ena Kajevic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rushiti vs Kajevic analysis and find out who is favored!
Arlinda Rushiti vs Ena Kajevic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rushiti 1 - 0 Kajevic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rushiti has won 40.38% of points on their second serve, while Kajevic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rushiti, in recent form, has won 57.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kajevic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rushiti has saved 53.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kajevic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rushiti has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 24/ 22), with Kajevic winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rushiti has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 45/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 28/ 49). Kajevic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 48/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 11% (W/L 1/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Rushiti has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12), where as Kajevic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rushiti winning 1 times and Kajevic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rushiti winning 2 and Kajevic winning 1. The last match between Rushiti and Kajevic was at the W15 Antalya, 18-12-2019, First, Hard with Arlinda Rushiti getting the victory 6-1 6-7(8) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rushiti and Kajevic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rushiti winning 1 times and Kajevic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rushiti winning 0, and Kajevic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rushiti has played against opponents with an average rank of 223.7 while Kajevic has played against players with an average rank of 217.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rushiti has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kajevic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rushiti has converted 51.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kajevic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
763
Rank
352
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
897
Rank
805
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
53% (204-180)
Career Total W/L
48% (114-122)
61% (17-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Arlinda Rushiti | Ena Kajevic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:0 | 1:59:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (45/84) | 66% (59/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (31/45) | 58% (34/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (23/39) | 27% (8/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 73% (8/11) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (47/89) | 36% (30/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-7(8) 6-1 |
Stats 
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Ena Kajevic
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arlinda Rushiti | Ena Kajevic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (17/11) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (40/25) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (316/272) | 0% (0/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (17/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.48 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 139 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:27 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 231.14 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1226/1860) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (750/1226) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (256/634) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (136/262) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (927/1878) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (16/27) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Arlinda Rushiti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
41%
(
28 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
38 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Zoziya Kardava
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Anastasiya Poplavska
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
42 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
53 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
53%
(
48 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Sophia Ksandinov
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
5
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Garkusha
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
108)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
11
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
55 of
108)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Olga Helmi
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Johanne Svendsen
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Kajevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Ena Kajevic
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Girelli
Player
Ena Kajevic
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ingrid Martins
Player
Ena Kajevic
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Rushiti Vs Kajevic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rushiti are available here and Kajevic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
